She Snoops to Conquer - Case Analysis Business Ethics Essay

Employee privacy is a very controversial topic. The first issue at hand is whether or not the employer in Case 9.3 has the right to invade her employees’ privacy. It can be argued that employers don’t have the right to invade their employees’ privacy. It is one thing for an employer to monitor their employees in the workplace to make sure they are not doing something that will affect the company’s profits, but it is a much more egregious issue for the employer to go beyond his or her interest to invade his or her employees’ privacy when they are not working. The Washington State Constitution Article I, Section 7 states that â€Å"no person shall be disturbed in his private affairs.† Essentially, privacy is widely acknowledged to be a†¦show more content†¦Fanuchi’s actions were illegal because they violated RCW 9.73.030, which states that it is unlawful for any individual to intercept, record, or divulge private communicatio n by use of any electronic devise unless they have express consent of all parties. RCW 9.73.030. Furthermore, on page 356 of the text book there is a case about â€Å"two male employees of Boston Sheraton Hotel who were secretly videotaped changing clothes in the locker room during a hunt for a drug dealer; they weren’t suspects, just bystanders.† Similarly, in the present case, the employee’s privacy was invaded when the employer discovered, by microphone, that the employee was selling drugs. Our privacy would have been wrongfully invaded if we were Fanuchi’s employees. As stated on page 348, â€Å"we seek to preserve and protect a sphere in which we can choose to think and act for ourselves, free from the illegitimate influence of our employers and other,† and if we can’t do that in the break room then where would we be able to do it? The book states on page 377, â€Å"the microphones contributed nothing to the apprehension of the thief.† The only purpose that the microphones held was to invade all of the employees’ p rivacy. If Fanuchi would have obtained consent from the employees, this would not be an issue of the invasion of privacy. The employees in Case 9.3 would have had control and a choice as to what to say or not to say depending on what they wanted their employer toShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesvi BRIEF CONTENTS 4 The Organization System 16 Organizational Culture 511 17 Human Resource Policies and Practices 543 18 Organizational Change and Stress Management 577 Appendix A Research in Organizational Behavior Comprehensive Cases Indexes Glindex 637 663 616 623 Contents Preface xxii 1 1 Introduction What Is Organizational Behavior? 3 The Importance of Interpersonal Skills 4 What Managers Do 5 Management Functions 6 †¢ Management Roles 6 †¢ ManagementRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pages......................................................................................... 488 The Scientific Method ........................................................................................................................ 490 Some Case Studies ............................................................................................................................. 491 Review of Major Points .....................................................................................